The Intelligent Design of AttractionThe theory of intelligent attraction (IA) holds that certain behaviors in the universe are best explained by an intelligent cause, as opposed to the more commonly accepted gravitational theories. IA is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claims of physicists and other scientists around the world who believe (in their heart of hearts, no doubt, many of them) that Newton and Kepler have explained all there is to explain and that the apparent design explanation for mass-attraction is an illusion.
IA is controversial because of the weight of its evidence, and not because objects with the same mass weigh more (or less) on different planets in our solar system. IA proponents believe that science should be conducted without regard for the so-called logical consequences of their claims, and without concern for political correctness or race relations.
Even eminnent scientists such as Charles Darwin may have been mistaken. For example, in The Origin of Species, p. 649, he says, "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity [emphasis added], from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved."
In fact Darwin provided no evidence or proofs for his claim of a 'fixed law of gravity.' No, he merely assumed it to be true. As if all right-thinking people would think so, too.
©2006-2011 Intelligent Attraction. All rights reserved.